00:00
00:00
Psil0
I like sci fi, horror, music, art, and other things. Feel free to ask me anything.

Age 34, Male

Researcher

Miskatonic University

C-bus, OH

Joined on 7/13/08

Level:
17
Exp Points:
3,064 / 3,210
Exp Rank:
18,053
Vote Power:
5.91 votes
Rank:
Police Officer
Global Rank:
13,423
Blams:
142
Saves:
572
B/P Bonus:
10%
Whistle:
Normal
Medals:
10

Rant on Contemporary Music

Posted by Psil0 - April 13th, 2010


Lately I've been hearing a lot of talk about the lack of creativity in modern music and it irks me a bit. Music is an art form and as with any form of art, it progresses and evolves. Modern music evolved based off what was happening before hand. For example, things like hard rock and punk, along with the influence of Black Sabbath helped to revolutionize and bring about the genre of Metal (in particular, thrash metal). Then with Slayer's influence on thrash, evolved the genre of Death Metal. This is just one example of an evolution in music, as there infinite possibilities that I could list.

But the main fact remains, music is an art and will evolve as so. People are constantly saying it's becoming stagnant. Though if you take a closer look, music has actually evolved a lot in the last 20 years. We've seen an evolution from grunge and alternative rock more to hard rock and metal (that's usually influenced heavily by what was done by bands like Maiden or Priest). And for the pop side, electro and house in the 80s has influenced a lot of the pop music being written today. Rap has also evolved (maybe not in lyrical content), but in structure it definitely has. Also the strong emergence of electronic music is becoming more relevant due to groups like Pendulum and Julien-K.

While we may not be getting the nostalgia we're looking for in music today, the point is that good music does exist and it just takes a bit of listening and willingness to open your ears up to a new experience. Which is something people did when bands were popping up in the early 60s and rock was still young. Also for people to say music is over commercialized, I'd just like to say, bands/groups/artist had even less control over the direction of the music in the past. In fact most of them were sheep to the system and only put out hits to make money. One of these groups, were known as the Beatles, early in their career their music was heavily commercialized and produced for the exclusive thought of making a "hit". To say music in the past wasn't or isn't nearly as commercialized as music is today, is a lie.

Btw the music I primarily listen to is progressive, avant garde, and different in style. But I'm also open to anything that sounds good (which is why it is impossible to list all my favorite groups).

(Some of) My (primary) favorite musicians and bands: The Mars Volta, The White Stripes, The Raconteurs, Frank Zappa, Mr. Bungle, Pink Floyd, Blue Oyster Cult, Rush, Muse, Tool, Mastodon, Avenged Sevenfold, S.O.A.D, Serj Tankian, Rage Against the Machine, Joe Satriani, Steve Vai, Steve Morse, Al Di Mieloa, Led Zepplin, Alice in Chains, At The Drive In, Incubus, Dream Theater (though not so much these days), Klayton/CellDweller, Pendulum, Julien-K, David Gilmour, Syd Barrett... And of course, Pinkly Smooth.


Comments

<a href="http://newsimg.ngfiles.com/179000/179811_a_history_of_African_Ameri.jpg">http://newsimg.ngfiles.com/179000/179 811_a_history_of_African_Ameri.jpg</a>

"evolve" isnt very good word choice.

Like the picture, but music in all honesty is truly always evolving.

Music in the past 100-200 years or so has made steps both backward and forward many times. It rebells against the mainstays of the last generation and then rebells against the rebellion by regressing to the generation before that. It's a cycle.

You're probably right about that state of commercialism in music these days. Hell, most classical and some romantic era music was created just so that the composer could get by. So, YES, it was for the money back then too (although, the people who created this music also had their own side projects that they really cared about). However, the mass majority of popular music today is also commercialized (no shit). The music industry in the 20th and 21st century has not changed much in hundreds of years. What has changed is it's sincerity. From the 20's to the 80's, everything popular was unashamedly commercial in nature (from big band, crooners, popular rhythm and blues, to bubblegum pop, glam rock, etc). Starting in the 90's, a new trend started. The new, edgier revolutionary genres paraded about as being anti-commercial but ultimately diluted themselves by becoming mainstream radio mainstays (punk, grunge, alternative rock, indie, emo). The followers of these genres believed that they were going against the norm, and some still do. What is insincere about new popular music is that people think that they're music isn't "popular" and that they are making a choice to go against the norm. The music industry has learned how to harness this and pretend that their labels are "independent".

So it's all give and take. What we have in the past is unabashed commercialism with the occasional rare gem of a band that doesn't give a shit. What we have today is the regular part of the the industry that shoves pop down our throats, and the other part trying to fool us with new "different" bands that don't sound like anyone else (when, in fact, there are so many bands that sound like them and the only reason why we don't hear about them is that aren't picked up by labels). Of course, there are some gems today. But, in my own opinion, it takes some willpower to go out and try to find them.

On a side note, The White Stripes aren't progressive/avant-garde/different/etc . Everything that they've done just sounds like 60's/70's garage rock with blues stylings (no offense since I do like Jack White, it just gets old after a while). Kudos on the Zappa though, not many people can stomach much of his stuff.

Hahaha, well I have to have my blues. But what Jack does is different at times. I'd say he's kind of different type of blues player, maybe not Avant Garde or Progressive, but a little different from the other multitude of blues players

Also on the Zappa note, you kind of have just have to like Zappa off the bat. He's one of those guys (like Mr. Bungle) that you just can't comprehend without having the right understanding of the appeal he was going for.